New C&CC rule for information

  • Thread starter Deleted member 2597
  • Start date
Trigger said:
I actually have 180 days unoccupancy on my property with CCC.
Click to expand...
In which case, it makes even less sense for the same Club to collect the premium for an absence of 6 months without interruption and to then 'challenge you' for spending more than 60 of those days in 90 days at CCC sites ...

Steve
 
Absolute idiocy. What does it matter anyway, all they need is to make sure you don’t full time on the same site, if it’s 60 days across their network it’s crazy. Not sure why I bother with membership of either of them as so far this year I have been on a site a total of two nights, don’t think I managed a week all last year
 
nabsim said:
Absolute idiocy. What does it matter anyway, all they need is to make sure you don’t full time on the same site, if it’s 60 days across their network it’s crazy. Not sure why I bother with membership of either of them as so far this year I have been on a site a total of two nights, don’t think I managed a week all last year
Click to expand...
Whilst we had the Gobur Folding Caravan, and then the vintage Swift Tourer, we just accepted that formal sites were the only way to go, despite the bureaucracy from a bygone era; but, since buying the M/home and discovering the flexibility of the Aire, we realise what we have been missing over the years. Both Clubs project an attitude of 'we are doing you a favour by allowing you to stay with us', an obvious example being the artificial inflation of the non-Member price per night, alongside the cajoling to become a Member 'and get a £13 per night discount' ... The Clubs are hoping to reach the 20th Century in the not too distant future, which may coincide with their being available to phone outwith the Mon-Fri 0900-1700 timetable ... I can dream!

Steve
 
I realise that this must be something new as some years back I met a lady on a C&CC site who lived in her caravan. She didn't have a car or even a driving licence. She stayed 28 days and then one of her children came and moved her to another site. She used 3 x C&CC sites in the area and just stayed at them all in rotation. She'd lost her house in a messy divorce and most definitely didn't have anywhere else to live, although I think she was using one her kid's addresses for correspondence etc.
 
Caz said:
I realise that this must be something new as some years back I met a lady on a C&CC site who lived in her caravan. She didn't have a car or even a driving licence. She stayed 28 days and then one of her children came and moved her to another site. She used 3 x C&CC sites in the area and just stayed at them all in rotation. She'd lost her house in a messy divorce and most definitely didn't have anywhere else to live, although I think she was using one her kid's addresses for correspondence etc.
Click to expand...
I was told I would have to move after 28 days when I worked around the country. The strange thing is that I was never asked to move in the Low Season when the sites were less than one quarter full. :giggle:
 
Caz said:
I realise that this must be something new as some years back I met a lady on a C&CC site who lived in her caravan. She didn't have a car or even a driving licence. She stayed 28 days and then one of her children came and moved her to another site. She used 3 x C&CC sites in the area and just stayed at them all in rotation. She'd lost her house in a messy divorce and most definitely didn't have anywhere else to live, although I think she was using one her kid's addresses for correspondence etc.
Click to expand...
Sadly, she's probably far from being unique! These Committees who set this type of Rules live in the clichéd 'Bubble' of stability and security, blissfully unaware of their members who face loneliness/bereavement/fnancial hardship etc and add insult to injury by using confrontational language such as 'challenging'. Why not 'seek clarification or verification'?

Steve
 
marchie said:
Sadly, she's probably far from being unique! These Committees who set this type of Rules live in the clichéd 'Bubble' of stability and security, blissfully unaware of their members who face loneliness/bereavement/fnancial hardship etc and add insult to injury by using confrontational language such as 'challenging'. Why not 'seek clarification or verification'?

Steve
Click to expand...
 
Well I guess the rules are the rules if the club take action to protect their licence and business why should they not? Trouble seems to be the individial dealing with specific cases and we have all encountered them in various call centres, We have BEEN CCC Members for many years and are now vintage members, we have been members of many clubs over the years and still think the CCC is the best for our needs, very seldom do we use their full facility sites unless DA is rallying on one, but we frequently use the D A rallies and TH S sites as and when it suits us, insure our home and motor home with them too, We call the club for ferry tickets etc too cheapest for us? Although this trip to Portugal I was told that I had to go through the club Web site with a link to ferries and got a good price that was still with the club discount, we will see what joppens when we call again in May for our return ferry tickets?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Users who viewed this discussion (Total:0)

Back
Top