The current proposal is to put a levy tax per head on anyone staying at an accommodation location be it hotel campsite, b&b etc.
I do see this an issue as an Aire owner who only charges £5 a night per van to encourage people to stay in a safe, legal, and insured location that’s open all year. We offer this as an affordable alternative to campsites with their higher costs and restrictions or a free park up location that may upset locals for a variety of reasons; be without owner’s permission; be against legislation (ie permitted planning/town & country/caravan acts); add to damage to habitat; or sadly by the few be misused with rubbish/waste left behind.
As currently proposed this will mean we will have to collect the levy for the council, making our Aire appear far more expensive to our visitors (while we still receive £5 a van) and counteracting the whole principal of the affordable Aire stopover as a basic alternative to a campsite. More motorhomers will choose the cheaper option of parking unofficially. This will most likely make Aires like ours completely financially unviable (we survive on a shoestring and large measure of our goodwill as it is) and encourage more people to park up off site which is ironically a key issue in the very busy tourist parts of Scotland such as the NC500 and Skye. I did ask some of the CAMpRA leadership if they would respond to the Scottish Government’s current levy proposal as I think it could be the end of much of the good work they have done in getting many small private Aires to open.
In this case the ‘land weeps’ and ‘dirty truth’ have a very valid point in that the levy as it stands would not be applied to anyone travelling in a motorhome/campervan unless they stayed on a campsite/CL/Aire. (Note the tax is not proposed to be levied on the hire of campers and motorhomes either). It just seem to penalise those motorhomers / campervanners already paying directly into the local communities by paying for accommodation as they would pay more, whilst those staying for free in unofficial parkups would still pay nothing. (Don’t think I’m judging these either as having toured Scotland for 7 months a few years back we used a complete mix of places to stay especially as it was over winter before the Aires started opening so places were more limited)
Scotland is such a beautiful place and tourist money coming into the local communities is much needed and appreciated, but there has been insufficient government money for the infrastructure, and marketing of routes like the NC500 has created extremely busy areas where in places roads are deteriorating and investment is needed.
Hopefully the government will find a fair and effective way to resolve this but I don’t hold out much hope.